4.6 Article

A quantitative proteomics study on olfactomedin 4 in the development of gastric cancer

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY
Volume 47, Issue 5, Pages 1932-1944

Publisher

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2015.3168

Keywords

gastric cancer; mechanism; olfactomedin 4; iTRAQ; migration; invasion; proteomics

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81171560, 30930082, 81171561, 30972584, 81372399]
  2. National Science and Technology Major Project of China [2008ZX10002-006, 2012ZX1002007001, 2011ZX09302005, 2012ZX09303001-001, 2012ZX10002003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gastric cancer (GC) is now one of the most common malignancies with a relatively high incidence and high mortality rate. The prognosis is closely related to the degree of tumor metastasis. The mechanism of metastasis is still unclear. Proteomics analysis is a powerful tool to study and evaluate protein expression in tumor tissues. In the present study, we collected 15 gastric cancer and adjacent normal gastric tissues and used the isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ) method to identify differentially expressed proteins. A total of 134 proteins were differentially expressed between the cancerous and non-cancerous samples. Azurocidin 1 (AZU1), CPVL, olfactomedin 4 (OLFM4) and Villin 1 (VIL1) were upregulated and confirmed by western blot analysis, real-time quantitative PCR and immunohistochemical analyses. These results were in accordance with iTRAQ. Furthermore, silencing the OLFM4 expression suppressed the migration, invasion and proliferation of the GC cells in vitro. The present study represents a successful application of the iTRAQ method in analyzing the expression levels of thousands of proteins. Overexpression of OLFM4 in gastric cancer may induce the development of gastric cancer. Overall, suppression of OLFM4 expression may be a promising strategy in the development of novel cancer therapeutic drugs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available