4.6 Article

Methane dry reforming on Ni loaded hydroxyapatite and fluoroapatite

Journal

APPLIED CATALYSIS A-GENERAL
Volume 317, Issue 2, Pages 299-309

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2006.10.029

Keywords

methane dry reforming; Ni loaded calcium-hydroxyapatite; Ni loaded calcium-fluoroapatite; XRD; IR; DRS; XPS and TPR

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Calcium-hydroxyapatite and calcium-fluoroapatite loaded with different amounts of nickel were synthesized and characterized by several techniques including scanning electron microscopy, temperature programmed reduction (TPR), UV-visible-NIR and XPS spectroscopy. Three types of nickel species were detected in the two series of catalysts (i) Ni2+ ions exchanged with Ca2+ ions of the apatite framework. This Ni2+/Ca2+ exchange seems to be restricted to nickel loadings inferior to 1 wt% Ni, (ii) small particles of NiO exhibiting strong interactions with the carriers (for x > 1 wt% Ni) and (iii) large particles of NiO which appear at high loadings. The distribution of the nickel between these three hosting sites depends on the nature of the apatite. For instance the amount of exchanged Ni2+ ions in Ni(1)/CaHAp is twice more important than in Ni(1)/CaFAp. The Ni(x)/CaHAp and Ni(x)/CaFAp catalysts were tested in methane dry reforming with CO2. Methane conversion at 600 degrees C, increases with the nickel loading up to x = 4 where the activity is around the thermodynamic equilibrium (78%) and H-2/CO ratio close to 1. These results were confirmed by the investigation of the catalysts activity versus the temperature. Carbon deposition on the catalysts was found to also increase with nickel loading but without provoking any significant decay of the activity after 4 h on stream. The encouraging results achieved were attributed to the synergy between the basic properties of the apatites, their aptitude to chemisorb CO2 and the catalytic features of the supported nickel. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available