4.7 Article

Removal of dye from aqueous solution using a combination of advanced oxidation process and nanofiltration

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 140, Issue 1-2, Pages 95-103

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.06.075

Keywords

nanofiltration; eosin Y dye; advanced oxidation process; Fenton's reagent; permeate flux

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In order to have energy and cost effective separation of dyes, a combination of advanced oxidation process (AOP) using Fenton's reagent and nanofiltration (NF) is proposed. Three combinations of AOP and NF are studied using a synthetic solution of eosin dye. Scheme-1 is AOP followed by NF. Scheme-2 is NF followed by AOP. And Scheme-3 is two-step NF. The concentration of eosin dye studied in the first step of each of the schemes is in the range of 70-200 mg/l. The operating transmembrane pressures for NF steps are 552, 689 and 828 kPa. The crossflow velocities are 0.46, 0.69 and 0.91 m/s. The schemes are compared for permeate flux, permeate concentration and duration of operation. In Scheme-1, AOP is conducted for 30 min, and then subjected to NF, whereas in Scheme-2, the time needed for AOP is more than 3 It to achieve the concentration level of the dye below 1 mg/l. Thus, it is found that Scheme-1 is superior to Scheme-2 due to lesser time requirement. However, Scheme-3 involving no AOP, is also suitable for dye separation as the final eosin concentration in the permeate falls below 1 mg/l. Scheme-1 is found suitable for dye concentration of 70 mg/l and the most appropriate composition of Fenton's reagent is 1665 mg/l of H=O- and 347.5 mg/l of FeSO4.7H(2)O. Suitable NF operating conditions in step 2 of Scheme-1 is transmembrane pressure of 689 kPa and crossflow velocity of 0.91 m/s. In Scheme-3, the suitable operating conditions for NF in both the steps are 828 kPa transmembrane pressure and 0.91 m/s crossflow velocity. Scheme-2 is found to be unsuitable. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available