4.7 Article

Use of coacervates for the on-site extraction/preservation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and benzalkonium surfactants

Journal

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
Volume 584, Issue 1, Pages 181-188

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2006.11.022

Keywords

polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; benzalkonium surfactants; preservation; micelle-based coacervates; monitoring programs

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The suitability of coacervates for the preservation of organic pollutants after their extraction from water samples was investigated for the first time. Acid-induced sodium dodecanesulfonic acid (SDSA) micelle-based coacervates were selected for this purpose. Their capacity to preserve benzalkonium homologue (C-12, C-14 and C-16) surfactants (BASs) and different polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) [benzo(a)pyrene (BaP), benzo(b)fluoranthene (BbF), benzo(k)fluoranthene (BkF), benzo(ghi)perylene (BghiP), benzo(a)anthracene (BaA) and indene(1,2,3-c-d)pyrene (IP)] was investigated. BASs and PAHs were efficiently extracted by the coacervate by formation of mixed aggregates and hydrophobic interactions, respectively. Their stability into the coacervate was investigated under three temperature conditions (room temperature, 4 degrees C and -20 degrees C) and two hydrochloric acid concentrations (3.75 M and 4.2 M), which was used to induce coacervation. No losses were observed during at least 3 months at the different experimental conditions tested. The increase of the temperature up to 35 degrees C for a month did not affect the stability of the target compounds. No influence of the water matrix (distilled, river or wastewater) on the stabilization of BASs and PAHs was observed. The high-stabilizing capacity of the coacervate for the target compounds and its low volume make easy the transport and storage of analytes. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available