4.8 Article

Transcriptomic analysis of growth heterosis in larval Pacific oysters (Crassostrea gigas)

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0610880104

Keywords

MPSS; nonadditive expression; factorial cross of partially inbred lines; potence; protein metabolism

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Compared with understanding of biological shape and form, knowledge is sparse regarding what regulates growth and body size of a species. For example, the genetic and physiological causes of heterosis (hybrid vigor) have remained elusive for nearly a century. Here, we investigate gene-expression patterns underlying growth heterosis in the Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas) in two partially inbred (f=0.375) and two hybrid larval populations produced by a reciprocal cross between the two inbred families. We cloned cDNA and generated 4.5 M sequence tags with massively parallel signature sequencing. The sequences contain 23,274 distinct signatures that are expressed at statistically nonzero levels and show a highly positively skewed distribution with median and modal counts of 9.25 million and 3 transcripts per million, respectively. For nearly half of these signatures, expression level depends on genotype and is predominantly nonadditive (hybrids deviate from the inbred average). Statistical contrasts suggest approximate to 350 candidate genes for growth heterosis that exhibit concordant nonadditive expression in reciprocal hybrids; this represents only approximate to 1.5% of the > 20,000 transcripts. Patterns of gene expression, which include dominance for low expression and even underdominance of expression, are more complex than predicted from classical dominant or overdominant explanations of heterosis. Preliminary identification of ribosomal proteins among candidate genes supports the suggestion from previous studies that efficiency of protein metabolism plays a role in growth heterosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available