4.7 Article

Neural activity is modulated by trial history: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of the effects of a previous antisaccade

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages 1791-1798

Publisher

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3662-06.2007

Keywords

plasticity; antisaccade; frontal eye field; functional neuroimaging; context; cognition

Categories

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [R01 RR16594, P41 RR14075, U24 RR021382] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIBIB NIH HHS [R01 EB001550] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIMH NIH HHS [R01 MH67720, F21 MH72120] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS052858-01] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Saccadic latencies are influenced by what occurred during the previous trial. When the previous trial is an antisaccade, the latencies of both prosaccades and antisaccades are prolonged. The aim of this study was to identify neural correlates of this intertrial effect of antisaccades. Specifically, based on both monkey electrophysiology and human neuroimaging findings, we expected trials preceded by antisaccades to be associated with reduced frontal eye field (FEF) activity relative to those preceded by prosaccades. Twenty-one healthy participants performed pseudorandom sequences of prosaccade and antisaccade trials during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) with concurrent monitoring of eye position. We compared activity in trials preceded by an antisaccade with activity in trials preceded by a prosaccade. The primary result was that a previous antisaccade prolonged saccadic latency and reduced fMRI activity in the FEF and other regions. No regions showed increased activity. We interpret the reduced FEF activity and slower saccadic responses to reflect inhibitory influences on the response system as a consequence of performing an antisaccade in the previous trial. This demonstrates that neural activity is modulated by trial history, consistent with a rapid, dynamic form of learning. More generally, these results highlight the importance of trial history as a source of variability in both behavioral and neuroimaging studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available