4.7 Article

NOX5 variants are functionally active in endothelial cells

Journal

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
Volume 42, Issue 4, Pages 446-459

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2006.10.054

Keywords

NOX5; NADPH oxidase; endothelial cells; reactive oxygen species; proliferation; angiogenesis; thrombin

Ask authors/readers for more resources

NADPH oxidases have been identified as sources of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in vascular cells. In addition to the initially described enzyme containing gp91phox (NOX2), several homologues to NOX2 have been identified. Whereas NOX1, NOX2, and NOX4 are expressed in endothelial cells, a functional role of NOX5 containing additional N-terminal calcium-binding domains of varying sequences has not been reported in these cells. NOX5 protein was found in the endoplasmic reticulum of human microvascular endothelial cells (HMEC-1) and in the vascular wall. HMEC-1 cells expressed NOX5 beta and NOX5 delta as well as a variant lacking calcium-binding domains (NOX5S). NOX5 beta and NOX5S increased basal ROS levels. lonomycin exclusively enhanced NOX5 beta-mediated ROS production. Although p22phox, when overexpressed, interacted with both NOX5 proteins, it was not essential for NOX5-mediated ROS production. NOX5 proteins stimulated endothelial cell proliferation and the formation of capillary-like structures whereas depletion of NOX5 by siRNA prevented these responses to thrombin. These data show that endothelial cells express different NOX5 variants including NOX5S lacking calcium-binding domains. NOX5 proteins are functional, promoting endothelial ROS production, proliferation, and the formation of capillary-like structures and contribute to the endothelial response to thrombin. These findings suggest that NOX5 variants play a novel role in controlling ROS-dependent processes in the vasculature. (c) 2006 Elseviey Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available