4.7 Article

Zinc supplementation inhibits lipid peroxidation and the development of atherosclerosis in rabbits fed a high cholesterol diet

Journal

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
Volume 42, Issue 4, Pages 559-566

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2006.11.024

Keywords

zinc; F-2-isoprostanes; lipid peroxidation; atherosclerosis; cholesterol; oxysterol

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Developing atherosclerotic lesions in hypercholesterolemic rabbits are depleted in zinc, while iron accumulates. This study examined the influence of zinc supplementation on the development of atherosclerosis and used isotope dilution gas chromatography-mass spectrometry techniques to measure biomarkers of oxidative lipid damage in atherosclerotic rabbit aorta. Our previous method for F-2-isoprostane measurement was adapted to include the quantitation of cholesterol oxidation products in the same sample. Two groups of New Zealand white rabbits were fed a high cholesterol (1% w/w) diet and one group was also supplemented with zinc (1 g/kg) for 8 weeks. Controls were fed a normal diet. Zinc supplementation did not significantly alter the increase in total plasma cholesterol levels observed in animals fed high cholesterol. However, in cholesterol-fed animals zinc supplementation significantly reduced the accumulation of total cholesterol levels in aorta which was accompanied by a significant reduction in average aortic lesion cross-sectional areas of the animals. Elevated levels of cholesterol oxidation products (5,6- and cholesterol epoxides, 7 -hydroxycholesterol, 7-ketocholesterol) in aorta and total F-2-isoprostanes in plasma and aorta of rabbits fed a cholesterol diet were significantly decreased by zinc supplementation. Our data indicate that zinc has an antiatherogenic effect, possibly due to a reduction in iron-catalyzed free radical reactions. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available