4.8 Article

Ag/SiO2 core-shell nanoparticle-based surface-enhanced Raman probes for immunoassay of cancer marker using silica-coated magnetic nanoparticles as separation tools

Journal

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
Volume 22, Issue 7, Pages 1501-1507

Publisher

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2006.07.004

Keywords

surface-enhanced Raman scattering; Raman tags; magnetic nanoparticles; immunoassay

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A simple, sensitive and highly specific immunoassay has been developed based on surface-enhanced Raman scattering for human alpha-fetoprotem (AFP), a tumor marker for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. This strategy combines the Ag/SiO2 core-shell nanoparticles embedded with rhodamine B isothiocyanate dye molecules as Raman tags and the amino group modified silica-coated magnetic nanoparticle as immobilization matrix and separation too]. In the proposed system, a sandwich-type immunoassay was performed between polyclonal antibody functionalized Ag/SiO2 nanoparticle-based Raman tags and monoclonal antibody modified silica-coated magnetic nanoparticles. The presence of the analyte and the reaction between the antigen and antibody can be monitored by the Raman spectra of the Ag/SiO2 tags. Compared to the previous surface-enhanced Raman immunoassays, the main advantage of this strategy lies in two aspects. One is the high stability of Raman tags derived from the silica shell-coated silver core-shell nanostructure. The other is the use of silica-coated magnetic nanoparticles as immobilization matrix and separation tool, thus avoiding complicated pretreatment and washing steps. We have studied in detail the experimental parameters such as the effects of the antibody concentration modified on the Raman tags and on the magnetic particles, and the immunoreaction time. Using this strategy, concentration of human AFP up to 0.12 mu g/ml was detected with a detection limit of 11.5 pg/ml. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available