4.7 Article

A broad-band spectroscopic search for CO line emission in HDF850.1:: the brightest submillimetre object in the Hubble Deep Field-north

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 375, Issue 2, Pages 745-752

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11352.x

Keywords

galaxies : individual; HDF850.1; galaxies : starburst; cosmology : observations; radio lines : galaxies

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using the 100-m Green Bank Telescope, we have conducted a cm-wavelength search for CO J = 1-0 line emission towards the high-redshift, far-infrared (FIR) luminous object HDF850.1 over the redshift interval 3.3 less than or similar to z less than or similar to 5.4. Despite the wealth of existing multiwavelength observations, and the recent identification of a galaxy counterpart in deep K'-band (2.2 mu m) imaging, an unambiguous spectroscopic redshift has not yet been obtained for this object. A FIR-to-radio wavelength photometric redshift technique, however, predicts a similar to 90 per cent probability that the redshift is in the range, 3.3 less than or similar to z less than or similar to 5.4 (equivalent to an observed redshifted CO J= 1-0 emission line frequency, 26.5 greater than or similar to nu(obs) greater than or similar to 18.0 GHz), making HDF850.1 a potential occupant of the 'high-redshift tail' of submillimetre (submm)-selected galaxies. We have also conducted a search for CO J = 2-1 line emission over the narrower redshift range, 3.9 less than or similar to z less than or similar to 4.3. Although we do not detect any CO line emission in this object, our limits to the CO line luminosity are in broad agreement with the median value measured in the current sample of high-redshift, submm-selected objects detected in high-J CO line emission, but not sufficient to fully test the validity of the photometric redshift technique.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available