4.8 Article

DNA synthesis and repair genes RRM1 and ERCC1 in lung cancer

Journal

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
Volume 356, Issue 8, Pages 800-808

Publisher

MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa065411

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01-CA102726, R21-CA110487] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: RRM1, the regulatory subunit of ribonucleotide reductase, is involved in carcinogenesis, tumor progression, and the response of non-small-cell lung cancer to treatment. Methods: We developed an automated quantitative determination of the RRM1 protein in routinely processed histologic specimens. In these specimens, we measured the expression of RRM1 and two other proteins that are relevant to non-small-cell lung cancer: the excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) protein and the phosphatase and tensin homologue (PTEN). We compared the results with the clinical outcomes in 187 patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer who had received only surgical treatment. Results: RRM1 expression correlated with the expression of ERCC1 (P < 0.001) but not with the expression of PTEN (P=0.37). The median disease-free survival exceeded 120 months in the group of patients with tumors that had high expression of RRM1 and was 54.5 months in the group with low expression of RRM1 (hazard ratio for disease progression or death in the high-expression group, 0.46; P=0.004). The overall survival was more than 120 months for patients with tumors with high expression of RRM1 and 60.2 months for those with low expression of RRM1 (hazard ratio for death, 0.61; P=0.02). Among these 187 patients, the survival advantage was limited to the 30% of patients with tumors that had a high expression of both RRM1 and ERCC1. Conclusions: RRM1 and ERCC1 are determinants of survival after surgical treatment of early-stage, non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available