4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Effects of solvents on the adsorption selectivity of molecularly imprinted polymers: Molecular simulation and experimental validation

Journal

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
Volume 53, Issue 2, Pages 183-188

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2006.06.023

Keywords

molecularly imprinted polymers; solvent; molecular simulation; experimental validation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The influence of the solvent on the molecular recognition capability of molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) was studied. The energy difference (Delta E) of a molecule in vacuum and in a given solvent was calculated using density functional theory (DFF) at B3LYP/6-31+G** level, and used as a measure of the affinity of the solvent to the molecule. The AE of the template molecule, theophylline (THO), in three of the most extensively used solvents, chloroform, tetrahydrofuran (THF) and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), was calculated, in which chloroform gave the smallest AE and DMSO gave the largest. The same order for AE was obtained for the monomer, methacrylic acid (MAA), in the three solvents. The calculated results indicate that chloroform is the most suitable solvent for the preparation of MIP for THO. DMSO, however, is not since it has high affinities to THO and MAA, and these inhibit the interaction between the THO and MAA. To examine the validity of the simulated results, MIPs for THO were synthesized in the three solvents and used for the adsorption of THO, respectively. The MIP synthesized in chloroform showed the maximum selectivity while that synthesized in DMSO showed the worst, in agreement with the above molecular simulation. H NMR spectroscopy showed that the H-bond between THO and MAA is the major force in molecular recognition, and this can be much affected by the solvent. The results above are of fundamental importance for the development of MIPs. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available