4.8 Article

HIV-tat induces formation of an LRP-PSD-95-NMDAR-nNOS complex that promotes apoptosis in neurons and astrocytes

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0611699104

Keywords

glutamate; dementia; HIV-1; NeuroAIDS; excitotoxicity

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [P20RR015592, P20 RR015592] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [AI-051519, P30 AI051519] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIGMS NIH HHS [T32 GM007288, 5 T32 GM007288] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIMH NIH HHS [MH075679, MH052974, K01 MH076679, MH070297, R01 MH070297, R01 MH075679] Funding Source: Medline
  5. NINDS NIH HHS [NS11920, NS20752, P50 NS011920, R01 NS020752, NS45287, R01 NS045287] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

HIV infection of the central nervous system can result in neurologic dysfunction with devastating consequences in AIDS patients. NeuroAIDS is characterized by neuronal injury and loss, yet there is no evidence that HIV can infect neurons. Here we show that the HIV-encoded protein tat triggers formation of a macromolecular complex involving the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP), postsynaptic density protein-95 (PSID-95), N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA) receptors, and neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) at the neuronal plasma membrane, and that this complex leads to apoptosis in neurons negative as well as positive for NMDA receptors and also in astrocytes. Blockade of LR-Pmediated tat uptake, NMDA receptor activation, or neuronal nitric oxide synthase significantly reduces ensuing neuronal apoptosis, suggesting that formation of this complex is an early step in tat toxicity. We also show that the inflammatory chemokine, CCL2, protects against tat toxicity and inhibits formation of the complex. These findings implicate the complex in HIV-induced neuronal apoptosis and suggest therapeutic targets for intervention in the pathogenesis of NleuroAIDS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available