4.7 Article

Dissociable intrinsic connectivity networks for salience processing and executive control

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 27, Issue 9, Pages 2349-2356

Publisher

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5587-06.2007

Keywords

fMRI; functional connectivity; anterior cingulate; insula; salience; anxiety

Categories

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [M01 RR000070, P41 RR009784, RR009784, RR000070] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIA NIH HHS [K08 AG027086, K08 AG027086-01] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NICHD NIH HHS [R01 HD047520, HD047520] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIMH NIH HHS [MH050604, T32 MH019938, MH019938, R01 MH050604] Funding Source: Medline
  5. NINDS NIH HHS [K23 NS048302, NS048302, K23 NS048302-03] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Variations in neural circuitry, inherited or acquired, may underlie important individual differences in thought, feeling, and action patterns. Here, we used task-free connectivity analyses to isolate and characterize two distinct networks typically coactivated during functional MRI tasks. We identified a salience network, anchored by dorsal anterior cingulate (dACC) and orbital frontoinsular cortices with robust connectivity to subcortical and limbic structures, and an executive-control network that links dorsolateral frontal and parietal neocortices. These intrinsic connectivity networks showed dissociable correlations with functions measured outside the scanner. Prescan anxiety ratings correlated with intrinsic functional connectivity of the dACC node of the salience network, but with no region in the executive-control network, whereas executive task performance correlated with lateral parietal nodes of the executive-control network, but with no region in the salience network. Our findings suggest that task-free analysis of intrinsic connectivity networks may help elucidate the neural architectures that support fundamental aspects of human behavior.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available