4.4 Article

Rehabilitation outcome following hip fracture surgery in elderly diabetics: A prospective cohort study of 224 patients

Journal

DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages 339-345

Publisher

INFORMA HEALTHCARE
DOI: 10.1080/09638280600834542

Keywords

rehabilitation; hip fracture; surgery; elderly; diabetes mellitus

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose. To characterize the course and outcome of rehabilitation following hip fracture (HF) in elderly diabetic patients. Method. A non-interventional prospective cohort study of 224 elderly diabetic patients who were hospitalized for rehabilitation, compared to 738 non-diabetic patients. Stepwise multiple regression was used to assess the relative contribution of the variables to the variance of the rehabilitation outcome. Results. The absolute efficacy of rehabilitation was lower in diabetics vs. non-diabetics (28.8 +/- 20.0 vs. 31.8 +/- 18.4, respectively, p = 0. 04). This difference was caused by a significantly lower pre-event Functional Independence Measure (FIM(TM)) (112 +/- 17 vs. 115 +/- 14, p = 0.002) and a significantly higher rate of prior stroke with motor impairment (16% vs. 7%, p < 0.0001). No significant difference was found between the study groups for various rehabilitation-related complications, including mortality. None of the 12 specific variables associated with diabetes or its complications was significantly and independently associated with the outcome of rehabilitation among diabetics. Conclusions. The outcome of rehabilitation in elderly diabetic patients following HF is significantly worse than in non-diabetics. This result stems from the poor pre-event functional state of these patients. The results of this study can help to predict the outcome of rehabilitation in elderly diabetic patients who are candidates for rehabilitation following surgical repair of HF.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available