4.6 Article

New techniques for the estimation of naturally occurring brassinosteroids

Journal

JOURNAL OF PLANT GROWTH REGULATION
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages 1-14

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00344-006-0045-2

Keywords

antibodies; Arabidopsis; brassinosteroids; enzyme immunoassay; HPLC-MS; rape pollen

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have developed enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) for measuring 24-epicastasterone and related brassinolide analogs, with detection ranges of 0.005 to 50 pmoles. Polyclonal antibodies used in these assays were raised against 24-epicastasterone carboxymethyloxime-bovine serum albumin conjugates and were found to have high specificity for 24-epibrassinosteroids. Natural brassinosteroids (BRs), such as brassinolide and 24-epibrassinolide, exhibited relatively high cross-reactivities with the generated antibodies, whereas other BR analogs with beta-oriented hydroxyl groups at C-2, C-3, C-22, and C23 lacked immunoreactivity. Through the use of internal standardization, dilution assays, recovery of authentic [H-3]24-epicastasterone, and immunohistograms, the ELISAs have been shown to be applicable for estimating 24-epibrassinosteroid levels in crude plant extracts. To analyze brassinosteroids in tissues from young bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L., cv. Pinto), Daucus carota ssp.sativus plants and Arabidopsis thaliana L. Heynh. seedlings, and rape (Brassica napus L.) pollen, the extracts were fractionated by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and the resulting fractions were analyzed by the ELISA method. Immunohistogram ELISA analysis of HPLC fractions indicated that major peaks of immunoreactivity co-chromatographed with the labeled and unlabeled 24-epibrassinolide. A highly sensitive electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (MS) technique (LOD: 50 fmol) was also developed and the results obtained by the HPLC-ELISA and HPLC-MS approaches were compared.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available