4.5 Article

Systemic hypoperfusion is associated with executive dysfunction in geriatric cardiac patients

Journal

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages 477-483

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2006.01.001

Keywords

cardiovascular disease; neuropsychology; cognition; executive functioning; cardiac output; systemic perfusion; heart failure

Funding

  1. NIA NIH HHS [F32 AG022773-01, P30-AG013846, F32 AG022773, P30 AG013846, P30 AG013846-06, F32 AG022773-02, R01-AG017975, F32-AG022773, R01 AG017975] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NICHD NIH HHS [K12 HD043444, K12-HD043444] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIMH NIH HHS [K23-MH065857, K23 MH065857] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study examines the relationship between systemic hypoperfusion via cardiac output (CO) and neuropsychological performances emphasizing executive function in an aging cohort. Geriatric outpatients with treated, stable cardiovascular disease (CVD) and no history of neurological illness (n = 72, ages 56-85) were administered cognitive measures with an emphasis on executive functioning. Echocardiogram findings were used to stratify participants into two groups: low CO (< 4.0 L/min) and normal CO (>= 4.0 L/min). Between-group comparisons were made using ANCOVAs adjusting for systolic blood pressure. The low CO group performed significantly worse than the normal CO group on DKEFS Tower Test and DKEFS Trail Making Test. No significant between-group differences were noted for any of the other counitive indices. Findings suggest that reduced CO is associated with poorer executive functioning among geriatric outpatients with stable CVD. as the cognitive profile emphasizes a relationship between systemic hypoperfusion and problems with sequencing and planning. The executive dysfunction profile may be secondary to reduced blood flow to vulnerable subcortical structures implicated in frontal-subcortical circuitry. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available