4.7 Article

An experimental study of the size effect on adiabatic gas-liquid two-phase flow patterns and void fraction in microchannels

Journal

PHYSICS OF FLUIDS
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.2567903

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Adiabatic gas-liquid flow patterns and void fractions in microchannels were experimentally investigated. Using nitrogen and water, experiments were conducted in rectangular microchannels with hydraulic diameters of 0.209 mm, 0.412 mm and 0.622 mm, respectively. Gas and liquid superficial velocities were varied from 0.06-72.3 m/s and 0.02-7.13 m/s, respectively. The main objective is focused on the effects of microscale channel sizes on the flow regime map and void fraction. The instability of flow patterns was observed. Four groups of flow patterns including bubbly slug flow, slug-ring flow, dispersed-churn flow, and annular flow were observed in microchannels of 0.412 mm and, 0.622 mm. In the microchannel of 0.209 mm, the bubbly slug flow became the slug flow and the dispersed-churn flow disappeared. The current flow regime maps showed the transition lines shifted to higher gas superficial velocity due to a dominant surface tension effect as the channel size was reduced. The regime maps presented by other authors for minichannels were found to not be applicable for microchannels. Time-averaged void fractions were measured by analyzing 8000 high speed video images for each flow condition. The void fractions hold a nonlinear relationship with the homogeneous void fraction as opposed to the relatively linear trend for the minichannels. A new correlation was developed to predict the nonlinear relationship that fits most of the current experimental data and those of the 0.1 mm diameter tube reported by Kawahara [Int. J. Multiphase Flow 28, 1411 (2002)] within +/- 15%. (c) 2007 American Institute of Physics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available