4.7 Article

Fouling of reverse osmosis membranes by biopolymers in wastewater secondary effluent: Role of membrane surface properties and initial permeate flux

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
Volume 290, Issue 1-2, Pages 173-181

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2006.12.027

Keywords

wastewater reclamation; reverse osmosis; membrane fouling; roughness; hydrophobicity; zeta potential; protein; polysaccharide; surface modification

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reverse osmosis (RO) is being increasingly used in treatment of domestic wastewater secondary effluent for potable and non-potable reuse. Among other solutes, dissolved biopolymers, i.e., proteins and polysaccharides, can lead to severe fouling of RO membranes. In this study, the roles of RO membrane surface properties in membrane fouling by two model biopolymers, bovine serum albumin (BSA) and sodium alginate, were investigated. Three commercial RO membranes with different surface properties were tested in a laboratory-scale cross-flow RO system. Membrane surface properties considered include surface roughness, zeta potential, and hydrophobicity. Experimental results revealed that membrane surface roughness had the greatest effect on fouling by the biopolymers tested. Accordingly, modified membranes with smoother surfaces showed significantly lower fouling rates. When Ca2+ was present, alginate fouled RO membranes much faster than BSA. Considerable synergistic effect was observed when both BSA and alginate were present. The larger foulant particle sizes measured in the co-existence of BSA and alginate indicate formation of BSA-alginate aggregates, which resulted in greater fouling rates. Faster initial flux decline was observed at higher initial permeate flux even when the flux was measured against accumulative permeate volume, indicating a negative impact of higher operating pressure. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available