4.6 Article

Genetic changes in bilateral breast cancer by comparative genomic hybridisation

Journal

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages 1-5

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10238-007-0123-1

Keywords

bilateral breast cancer; comparative genomic hybridisation; genetic change

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study is to find any specific genetic defect occurring frequently in bilateral breast cancer by examining the genetic changes of each chromosome using comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH). CGH was conducted for 36 breast cancer tissues taken from patients treated with surgery for bilateral breast cancer. Tumour and control DNAs were hybridised to metaphase chromosome with differential staining with fluorescein and rhodamine-dUTP. An average rate of green (DNA of tumour cell) against red (DNA of a normal peripheral blood lymphocyte) was calculated in these captured metaphase chromosomes and a ratio of more than 1.17 was defined as an acquisition, less than 0.85 as a loss and, finally, more than 2 as amplification. Twenty-six out of 36 cases (72.2%) showed a change in the number of DNA copies by CGH in one or more regions of gene. On average, 5.3 alterations for each chromosome (range, 1-14) were found, and gain was present more than loss at a ratio of 1.3:1. Loci that showed amplification were X, 17q, Xq, 8q, 14q11-21 and 17q22-qter. The locus showing the most gain was the X chromosome, which was observed in 15 (57.7%) out of 26 cases. Loss was most frequently observed in the short arm of chromosome 8. The concordance of genetic transformation of primary cancer and secondary cancer in bilateral breast cancer was an average of 18.7% in synchronous and 10.7% in metachronous cancer, showing higher similarity in synchronous breast cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available