4.5 Article

Testing relationships between clinical and non-clinical variables in xerostomia: A structural equation model of oral health-related quality of life

Journal

QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages 297-308

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-006-9108-x

Keywords

oral health-related quality of life; subjective well-being; structural equation modelling; Wilson and Cleary; xerostomia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: The aim of the study was to systematically test Wilson and Cleary's [Wilson IB, Cleary PD. JAMA 1995; 273: 59-65] conceptual model of the direct and mediated pathways between clinical and non-clinical variables in relation to the oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) of patients with xerostomia. Methods: We collected measures of clinical variables, self-reported symptoms, OHRQoL, global oral health perceptions and subjective well-being from 85 patients attending outpatient clinics. Results: Structural equation modelling indicated support for the dominant direct pathways between the main levels of the model; more severe clinical signs predicted worse patient reported symptoms; worse symptom perception was associated with a lower functional status as measured by OHRQoL; and lower OHRQoL predicted worse global oral health perceptions. There was no relationship between the final two levels of the model; global oral health perceptions and subjective well-being. Subjective well-being was associated instead with earlier non-adjacent levels; biological variables, symptoms and functional status. These pathways were both direct (salivary flow-well-being, functioning-well-being) and indirect (clinical signs-well being, symptom status-well-being). There were also indirect pathways; most notably, the impact of clinical variables on OHRQoL was mediated by patient reported symptom status. Conclusions: The results support Wilson and Cleary's conceptual model of patient outcomes as applied to a chronic oral health condition and highlight the complexity of (inter)relationships between key clinical and non-clinical variables. Further conceptual development of the model is discussed, particularly the role of individual difference factors, and theoretical and methodological issues in OHRQoL research are highlighted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available