4.4 Article

Coactivating signals for the hepatic lymphocyte gamma interferon response to Francisella tularensis

Journal

INFECTION AND IMMUNITY
Volume 75, Issue 3, Pages 1335-1342

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.01203-06

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [P20 RR0164443] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [R21 AI062939] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The facultative intracellular bacterium Francisella tularensis is capable of causing systemic infections in various hosts, including mice and humans. The liver is a major secondary site of F. tularensis infection, but hepatic immune responses to the pathogen remain poorly defined. Immune protection against the pathogen is thought to depend on the cytokine gamma interferon (IFN-gamma), but the cellular basis for this response has not been characterized. Here we report that natural killer cells from the livers of naive uninfected mice produced IFN-gamma when challenged with live bacteria in vitro and that the responses were greatly increased by coactivation of the cells with either recombinant interleukin-12 (IL-12) or IL-18. Moreover, the two cytokines had strong synergistic effects on IFN-gamma induction. Neutralizing antibodies to either IL-12 or IL-18 inhibited IFN-gamma production in vitro, and mice deficient in the p35 subunit of IL-12 failed to show IFN-gamma responses to bacterial challenge either in vitro or in vivo. Clinical isolates of highly virulent type A Francisella tularensis subsp. tularensis organisms were comparable to the live attenuated vaccine strain of Francisella tularensis subsp. holarctica in their ability to induce IL-12 and IFN-gamma expression. These findings demonstrate that cells capable of mounting IFN-gamma responses to F. tularensis are resident within the livers of uninfected mice and depend on coactivation by IL-12 and IL-18 for optimum responses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available