4.5 Article

Haplotypes in the human Foxo1a and Foxo3a genes;: impact on disease and mortality at old age

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages 294-301

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201766

Keywords

Foxo1a; Foxo3a; mortality; lifespan; age-related disease; haplotype

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recently, the Daf-16 gene has been shown to regulate the lifespan of nematodes and flies. In mammals, the Daf-16 homologues are forkhead (FOXO) transcription factors, of which specific functions have been identified for Foxo1a and Foxo3a. Despite that, their influence on human age-related trajectories and lifespan is unknown. Here, we analysed the effect of genetic variance in Foxo1a and Foxo3a on metabolic profile, age-related diseases, fertility, fecundity and mortality. This study was carried out in the prospective population-based Leiden 85-plus Study, which includes 1245 participants, aged 85 years or more. The mean follow-up time was 4.4 years. Haplotype analyses of Foxo1a revealed that carriers of haplotype 3 'TCA' have higher HbA1c levels (P=0.025) and a 1.14-fold higher all-cause mortality risk (P=0.021). This increase in mortality was attributable to death from diabetes, for which a 2.43-fold increase was observed ( P=0.025). The analyses with Foxo3a haplotypes revealed no differences in metabolic profile, fertility or fecundity. However, increased risks of stroke were observed for Foxo3a block-A haplotype 2 'GAGC' (P=0.007) and haplotype 4 'AAAT' (P=0.014) carriers. In addition, the haplotype 2 'GAGC' carriers had a 1.13-fold increased risk for all-cause mortality (P=0.036) and 1.19-fold increased risk for cardiovascular mortality (P=0.052). In conclusion, this study shows that genetic variation in evolutionarily conserved Foxo1a and Foxo3a genes influences lifespan in our study population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available