4.4 Article

Fracture heating in osteoporotic fractures: Is it really different? A basic science perspective

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2007.02.014

Keywords

fracture healing; acceleration; osteoporosis; mesenchymal stem cells; growth factors

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Osteoporosis is a major health problem characterized by compromised bone strength that predisposes patients to an increased risk of fracture. Osteoporotic patients differ from normal subjects in bone mineral composition, bone mineral content, and crystallinity. Poor bone quality in patients with osteoporosis presents the surgeon with difficult treatment decisions. Much effort has been expended on improving therapies that are expected to preserve bone mass and thus decrease fracture risk. Manipulation of both the local fracture environment in terms of application of growth factors, scaffolds and mesenchymal cells, and systemic administration of agents promoting bone formation and bone strength has been considered as a treatment option from which promising results have recently been reported. Surprisingly, less importance has been given to investigating fracture heating in osteoporosis. Fracture heating is a complex process of bone regeneration, involving a well-orchestrated series of biological events that follow a definable temporal and spatial sequence that may be affected by both biological factors, such as age and osteoporosis, and mechanical factors such as stability of the osteosynthesis. Current studies mainly focus on preventing osteoporotic fractures. In recent years, the literature has provided evidence of altered fracture heating in osteoporotic bone, which may have important implications in evaluating the effects of new osteoporosis treatments on fracture heating. However, the mechanics of this influence of osteoporosis on fracture heating have not yet been clarified and clinical evidence is stilt lacking.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available