4.7 Article

Observables sensitive to absolute neutrino masses: A reappraisal after WMAP 3-year and first MINOS results

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 75, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.75.053001

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the light of recent neutrino oscillation and nonoscillation data, we revisit the phenomenological constraints applicable to three observables sensitive to absolute neutrino masses: The effective neutrino mass in single beta decay (m(beta)); the effective Majorana neutrino mass in neutrinoless double beta decay (m(beta beta)); and the sum of neutrino masses in cosmology (Sigma). In particular, we include the constraints coming from the first Main Injector Neutrino Oscillation Search (MINOS) data and from the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) three-year (3y) data, as well as other relevant cosmological data and priors. We find that the largest neutrino squared mass difference is determined with a 15% accuracy (at 2 sigma) after adding MINOS to world data. We also find upper bounds on the sum of neutrino masses Sigma ranging from similar to 2 eV (WMAP-3y data only) to similar to 0.2 eV (all cosmological data) at 2 sigma, in agreement with previous studies. In addition, we discuss the connection of such bounds with those placed on the matter power spectrum normalization parameter sigma(8). We show how the partial degeneracy between Sigma and sigma(8) in WMAP-3y data is broken by adding further cosmological data, and how the overall preference of such data for relatively high values of sigma(8) pushes the upper bound of Sigma in the sub-eV range. Finally, for various combination of data sets, we revisit the (in)compatibility between current Sigma and m(beta beta) constraints (and claims), and derive quantitative predictions for future single and double beta decay experiments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available