4.4 Article

Arsenate detoxification in a Pseudomonad hypertolerant to arsenic

Journal

ARCHIVES OF MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 187, Issue 3, Pages 171-183

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00203-006-0182-9

Keywords

metal reduction; metal detoxification; bioremediation; arsenic reductase

Categories

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [GR/S30207/01] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/D013291/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. NERC [NE/D013291/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pseudomonas sp. strain As-1, obtained from an electroplating industrial effluent, was capable of growing aerobically in growth medium supplemented with up to 65 mM arsenate (As (V)), significantly higher concentrations than those tolerated by other reference arsenic resistant bacteria. The majority of the arsenic was detected in culture supernatants as arsenite (As (III)) and X-ray absorbance spectroscopy suggested that 30% of this cell-bound arsenic was As (V), 65% As (III) and 5% of arsenic was associated with sulphur. PCR analysis using primers designed against arsenic resistance genes of other Gram-negative bacteria confirmed the presence of an arsenic resistance operon comprising of three genes, arsR, arsB and arsC in order of predicted transcription, and consistent with a role in intracellular reduction of As (V) and efflux of As (III). In addition to this classical arsenic resistance mechanism, other biochemical responses to arsenic were implicated. Novel arsenic-binding proteins were purified from cellular fractions, while proteomic analysis of arsenic-induced cultures identified the upregulation of additional proteins not normally associated with the metabolism of arsenic. Cross-talk with a network of proteins involved in phosphate metabolism was suggested by these studies, consistent with the similarity between the phosphate and arsenate anions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available