4.4 Article

Urine stability for metabolomic studies: effects of preparation and storage

Journal

METABOLOMICS
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages 19-27

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11306-006-0042-2

Keywords

metabolomic; urine; stability; bacteria; NMR; human

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Metabolomic studies attempt to identify and profile unique metabolic differences among test populations, which may be correlated with a specific biological stress or pathophysiology. Due to the ease of collection and the metabolite-rich nature of urine, it is frequently used as a bio-fluid for human and animal metabolic studies. High-resolution H-1-NMR is an analytical tool used to qualitatively and quantitatively identify metabolites in urine. Urine samples were collected from healthy male and female subjects and prepared: raw, following centrifugation, filtration, or the addition of the bacteriostatic preservative sodium azide and analyzed by NMR. In addition, these samples were stored at room temperature (22 degrees C), in a refrigerator (4 degrees C), or in a deep-freeze (-80 degrees C). Samples were analyzed by NMR every week for a month and changes in concentrations of 55 easily identifiable metabolites were followed. The degree of change in metabolite concentrations following storage over a 4-week period were influenced by the different methods of sample preparation and storage. Significant changes in urine metabolites are likely due to bacterial contamination of the urine. Our study demonstrates that bacterial contamination of urine in normal individuals significantly alters the metabolic profile of urine over time and proper preparation and storage procedures must be followed to reduce these changes. By identifying appropriate methods of urine preparation and storage investigators will preserve the fidelity of the urine samples in order to better reflect the original metabolic state.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available