4.4 Article

Cultural differences in brand extension evaluation: The influence of analytic versus holistic thinking

Journal

JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH
Volume 33, Issue 4, Pages 529-536

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1086/510227

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Consumers evaluate brand extensions by judging how well they fit with the parent brand. We examine this process across cultures. We predict that consumers from Eastern cultures, characterized by holistic thinking, perceive higher brand-extension fit and evaluate brand extensions more favorably than do Western consumers, characterized by analytic thinking. Study 1 supports the existence of these cultural differences, with study 2 providing support for styles of thinking (analytic vs. holistic) as the drivers of cultural differences in brand extension evaluations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available