Journal
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 97, Issue 3, Pages 1941-1950Publisher
AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/jn.01305.2006
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- NIDCD NIH HHS [R01 DC000113-26, R01 DC000113, DC-00113, F32 DC000113] Funding Source: Medline
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Responses of the rat olfactory epithelium were assessed with the electroolfactogram while odorants were presented to the external nares with an artificial sniff or to the internal nares by positive pressure. A series of seven odorants that varied from very polar, hydrophilic odorants to very nonpolar, hydrophobic odorants were used. Although the polar odorants activated the dorsal olfactory epithelium when presented by the external nares ( orthonasal presentation), they were not effective when forced through the nasal cavity from the internal nares ( retronasal presentation). However, the nonpolar odorants were effective in both stimulus modes. These results were independent of stimulus concentration or of humidity of the carrier air. Similar results were obtained with multiunit recordings from olfactory bulb. These results help to explain why human investigations often report differences in the sensation or ability to discriminate odorants presented orthonasally versus retronasally. The results also strongly support the importance of odorant sorption in normal olfactory processes.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available