Journal
PLOS BIOLOGY
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages 531-542Publisher
PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050042
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- Intramural NIH HHS [Z99 TW999999] Funding Source: Medline
- Wellcome Trust [079091, 079080] Funding Source: Medline
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The prospects for the success of malaria control depend, in part, on the basic reproductive number for malaria, R-0. Here, we estimate Ro in a novel way for 121 African populations, and thereby increase the number of R-0 estimates for malaria by an order of magnitude. The estimates range from around one to more than 3,000. We also consider malaria transmission and control in finite human populations, of size H. We show that classic formulas approximate the expected number of mosquitoes that could trace infection back to one mosquito after one parasite generation, Z(0)(H), but they overestimate the expected number of infected humans per infected human, R-0(M. Heterogeneous biting increases Ro and, as we show, Z(0)(H) but we also show that it sometimes reduces R-0(H) those who are bitten most both infect many vectors and absorb infectious bites. The large range of R-0 estimates strongly supports the long-held notion that malaria control presents variable challenges across its transmission spectrum. In populations where Ro is highest, malaria control will require multiple, integrated methods that target those who are bitten most. Therefore, strategic planning for malaria control should consider R-0, the spatial scale of transmission, human population density, and heterogeneous biting.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available