4.8 Article

Overexpression of NBS1 induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition and co-expression of NBS1 and Snail predicts metastasis of head and neck cancer

Journal

ONCOGENE
Volume 26, Issue 10, Pages 1459-1467

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209929

Keywords

head and neck cancer; epithelial-mesenchymal transition; metastasis; NBS1; Snail

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Major causes of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC)-related deaths are cervical node and distant metastasis. We previously demonstrated that overexpression of the DNA double-strand break repair protein Nijmegen breakage syndrome 1 (NBS1) is a prognostic marker of advanced HNSCCs. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) was demonstrated to be the major mechanism responsible for mediating invasiveness and metastasis of late-stage cancers. We therefore investigated the role of NBS1 overexpression in mediating EMT and metastasis. NBS1 overexpression was associated with metastasis of HNSCC patients using tissue microarray immunohistochemistry approach. Induction of EMT was observed in an NBS1-overexpressing HNSCC cell line (FADUNBS), whereas short-interference RNA ( siRNA)mediated repression of endogenous NBS1 reversed the shift of EMT markers. Increased migration/invasiveness of FADUNBS was shown by in vitro and in vivo assays. NBS1 overexpression upregulated the expression of an EMT regulator Snail and its downstreamtarget matrix metalloproteinase-2. EMT phenotypes and increased migration/invasiveness of FADUNBS cells were reversed by siRNA-mediated repression of Snail expression or a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-specific inhibitor. In HNSCC samples, co-expression of NBS1/Snail in primary tumors correlated with metastasis and the worst prognosis. These results indicate that NBS1 overexpression induces EMT through the upregulation of Snail expression, and coexpression of NBS1/Snail predicts metastasis in HNSCCs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available