4.0 Article

Primary progressive aphasia: Relationship between gender and severity of language impairment

Journal

COGNITIVE AND BEHAVIORAL NEUROLOGY
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 38-43

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/WNN.0b013e31802e3bae

Keywords

dementia; frontotemporal dementia; sex differences; Alzheimer disease

Funding

  1. NIA NIH HHS [P30 AG013854, AG13854, AG20506, P30 AG013854-05, T32 AG020506, T32 AG020506-01] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDCD NIH HHS [R01 DC008552-01, R01 DC008552] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NINDS NIH HHS [F31 NS055557-02, F31 NS055557] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background/Aims: Factors influencing the course and severity of symptoms in primary progressive aphasia (PPA), a language-based dementia, have not been fully elucidated. The current study examined the influence of gender on performance on tests of naming and verbal fluency in patients with PPA. Comparisons were also made within a group of probable Alzheimer disease (AD) patients to determine whether gender differences were present in the most common form of neurodegenerative dementia. Methods: Performance was compared by gender within each diagnostic group on 3 language measures: the Boston Naming Test, category fluency (animals), and lexical fluency (FAS). Scores were compared at baseline (Visit 1) and in a subset of participants 6 to 15 months later (Visit 2). Results: Compared to men, women with PPA demonstrated significantly greater impairment on word fluency tests at both visits and also had a more aggressive rate of decline between visits. AD patients showed no differences by gender on any measure. Conclusions: The results suggest gender-based vulnerability in PPA where women express more severe language impairments than men given a similar duration of illness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available