4.8 Article

Final results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the antifibrotic efficacy of interferon-γ1b in chronic hepatitis C patients with advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis

Journal

HEPATOLOGY
Volume 45, Issue 3, Pages 569-578

Publisher

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.1002/hep.21561

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Interferon-gamma 1b (IFN-gamma 1b) is a pleiotropic cytokine that displays antifibrotic, antiviral, and antiproliferative activity. A total of 502 patients with compensated liver disease and an Ishak fibrosis score of 4-6 were randomized in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study, and 488 of these patients received subcutaneous injections of IFN-gamma 1b 100 mu g (group 1, n = 169), IFN-gamma 1b 200 mu g (group 2, n = 157), or placebo (group 3, n = 162) 3 times a week for 48 weeks. Most patients (83.6%) had cirrhosis at baseline (Ishak score = 5 or 6). Posttreatment liver biopsies were assessed in a blinded fashion for a reduction of 1 or more Ishak points (primary endpoint). Four hundred twenty patients with pretreatment and posttreatment liver biopsies were evaluable and showed no improvement in Ishak score between the 3 treatment groups (12.1%, 12.4%, and 16% of patients in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively; P > 0.05). Analysis of IFN-gamma-inducible biomarkers revealed that interferon-inducible T cell-alpha chemoattractant (ITAC), an IFN-gamma-inducible CXCR3 chemokine was an independent predictor of stable or improving Ishak score. IFN-gamma 1b was well tolerated. There were similar numbers of deaths in all 3 arms (5, 5, and 4, respectively), and most were related to complications of cirrhosis. Conclusion: IFN-gamma 1b therapy was not able to reverse fibrosis in patients with advanced liver disease for 1 year. Subgroups of patients with elevated ITAC levels and perhaps less advanced disease may be considered for future studies with IFN-gamma 1b.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available