4.7 Article

Physiological correction of Pompe disease by systemic delivery of adeno-associated virus serotype 1 vectors

Journal

MOLECULAR THERAPY
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages 501-507

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1038/sj.mt.6300100

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [P01 HL59412-06] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [P01 DK58327-03] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pompe disease is caused by a lack of functional lysosomal acid alpha-glucosidase (GAA) and can ultimately lead to fatal hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and respiratory insufficiency. Previously, we demonstrated the ability of recombinant adeno-associated virus serotype 1 (rAAV2/1) vector to restore the therapeutic levels of cardiac and diaphragmatic GAA enzymatic activity in vivo in a mouse model of Pompe disease. We have further characterized cardiac and respiratory function in rAAV2/1-treated animals 1 year post-treatment. Similar to the patient population, electrocardiogram measurements (P-R interval) are significantly shortened in the Pompemouse model. In rAAV2/1-treated mice, we show a significant improvement in cardiac conductance with prolonged P-R intervals of 39.34 +/- 1.6 ms, as compared to untreated controls (35.58 +/- 0.57 ms) (P <= 0.05). In addition, we note a significant decrease in cardiac left ventricular mass from 181.99 +/- 10.70 mg in untreated controls to 141.97 +/- 19.15 mg in the rAAV2/1-treated mice. Furthermore, the mice displayed an increased diaphragmatic contractile force of approximately 90% of wild-type peak forces with corresponding improved ventilation ( particularly in frequency, minute ventilation, and peak inspiratory flow). These results demonstrate that in addition to biochemical and histological correction, rAAV2/1 vectors can mediate sustained physiological correction of both cardiac and respiratory function in a model of fatal cardiomyopathy and muscular dystrophy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available