4.4 Article

An improved method to measure nitrate/nitrite with an NO-selective electrochemical sensor

Journal

NITRIC OXIDE-BIOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages 306-312

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.niox.2006.09.004

Keywords

endothelial cells; eNOS; nitric oxide; NO assay; NO sensor

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [P01 HL075209, HL67413, HL075209] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nitric oxide (NO) produced from NO synthase(s) (NOS) is an important cell signaling molecule in physiology and pathophysiology. It remains challenging, however, to measure NO accurately and reproducibly in many cell types producing relatively low levels of NO from the enzymes such as endothelial NO synthase (eNOS). In the present study, we describe a very sensitive and convenient analytical method that affords measurement of 1 to 2 nM concentration of NO, (nitrite plus nitrate) in culture media. In the present study, we used an ultra-sensitive NO-selective electrochemical sensor (AmiNO700) in combination with a highly efficient nitrate conversion method, which coupled the nitrate reductase step with the glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase system. An aliquot of conditioned culture media was first treated with nitrate reductase, NADPH, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase and glucose-6-phosphate to convert nitrate to nitrite quantitatively. The nitrite (that is present originally plus the reduced nitrate) was then reduced to equimolar NO in an acidic iodide bath while NO was being detected by the sensor. With this analytical method, we can quantitatively and reliably measure basal and stimulated NO release from cultured endothelial cells. We believe this improved assay should be useful in measuring a wide range of NO levels, especially the low but physiologically relevant levels, in many cell types. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available