4.5 Article

Mechanical properties and compositions of tissue engineered and native arteries

Journal

ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages 348-355

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10439-006-9226-1

Keywords

tissue engineering; blood vessels; mechanics; extracellular matrix; collagen; elastin; glycosaminoglycans; smooth muscle contractility; polyglycolic acid

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL063766-04, R01 HL063766, R01 HL63766] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

With the goal of mimicking the mechanical properties of a given native tissue, tissue engineers seek to culture replacement tissues with compositions similar to those of native tissues. In this report, differences between the mechanical properties of engineered arteries and native arteries were correlated with differences in tissue composition. Engineered arteries failed to match the strengths or compliances of native tissues. Lower strengths of engineered arteries resulted partially from inferior organization of collagen, but not from differences in collagen density. Furthermore, ultimate strengths of engineered vessels were significantly reduced by the presence of residual polyglycolic acid polymer fragments, which caused stress concentrations in the vessel wall. Lower compliances of engineered vessels resulted from minimal smooth muscle cell contractility and a lack of organized extracellular elastin. Organization of elastin and collagen in engineered arteries may have been partially hindered by high concentrations of sulfated glycosaminoglycans. Tissue engineers should continue to regulate cell phenotype and promote synthesis of proteins that are known to dominate the mechanical properties of the associated native tissue. However, we should also be aware of the potential negative impacts of polymer fragments and glycosaminoglycans on the mechanical properties of engineered tissues.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available