4.4 Article

Depressed patients' perceptions of depression treatment decision-making

Journal

HEALTH EXPECTATIONS
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages 62-74

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00424.x

Keywords

barriers; depression; shared decision-making

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Little is known about the feasibility and effects of patient-clinician shared decision-making (SDM) for depression treatment. Within a goal of informing the design of a SDM intervention, the objective of this study was to investigate depressed patients' perceptions of the treatment decision-making process with general practitioners (GPs). Settind and participants: Data were gathered from a convenience sample of 40 depressed patients to understand key aspects of treatment decision-making from the patient perspective. The sample varied in depression severity and type of setting in which treatment was sought. Main variables studied: Semi-structured interview questions focused on patients' prior experiences with depression and treatment, perceptions of the treatment decision-making process, and needs and expectations about treatment. Current depression severity was also assessed. Results: Patient lack of insight regarding depression severity substantially delayed patient engagement in treatment seeking and decision-making. Patients expected their GPs to be a first and main source of objective information and discussion about depression and treatment and to provide emotional support for decision-making. Patients also identified needs for additional information about depression and its treatment, as well as concerns about certain aspects of treatment. Conclusions: The depression treatment context has some aspects that differ from treatment decision-making for other types of health conditions. SDM approaches for depression treatment should be adapted based on depression severity and patient-identified needs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available