4.6 Article

Multilocus microsatellite typing (MLMT) reveals genetically isolated populations between and within the main endemic regions of visceral leishmaniasis

Journal

MICROBES AND INFECTION
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages 334-343

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.micinf.2006.12.009

Keywords

Leishmania donovani; Leishmania archibaldi; Leishmania infantum; visceral leishmaniasis; Kala-Azar; population genetics; Sudan; microsatellites; genotyping; epidemiology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Multilocus enzyme electrophoresis (MLEE) is the gold standard for taxonomy and strain typing of Leishmania, but has some limitations. An alternative reliable and fast genotyping method for addressing population genetic and key epidemiological questions, is multilocus microsatellite typing (MLMT). MLMT using 15 markers was applied to 91 strains of L. donovani, L. archibaldi, L. infantum and L. chagasi from major endemic regions of visceral leishmaniasis. Population structures were inferred by combination of Bayesian model-based and distance-based approaches. Six main genetically distinct populations were identified: (1) L. infantum/L. chagasi MON-1 and (2) L. infantum/L. chagasi non-MON-1, both Mediterranean region/South America; (3) L. donovani (MON-18), L. archibaldi (MON-82), L. infantum (MON-30, 81) and (4) L. donovani (MON-31, 274), L. archibaldi (MON-82, 257, 258), L. infantum (MON-267), both Sudan/Ethiopia; (5) L. donovani MON-2, India; (6) L. donovani (MON-36, 37, 38), Kenya and India. Substructures according to place and time of strain isolation were detected. The VL populations seem to be predominantly clonal with a high level of inbreeding. Allelic diversity was highest in the Mediterranean region, intermediate in Africa and lowest in India. MLMT provides a powerful tool for global taxonomic, population genetic and epidemiological studies of the L. donovani complex. (c) 2007 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available