4.3 Article

Dormancy-break and germination in seeds of Prunus campanulata (Rosaceae):: role of covering layers and changes in concentration of abscisic acid and gibberellins

Journal

SEED SCIENCE RESEARCH
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages 21-32

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0960258507383190

Keywords

abscisic acid; cold and warm stratification; endocarp; fluridone; germination; gibberellins; paclobutrazol; Prunus campanulata; seed coat; seed dormancy

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Intact seeds (seed + endocarp) from freshly harvested fruits of Prunus campanulata were dormant, and required 4-6 weeks of warm followed by 8 weeks of cold stratification for maximum germination percentage. Removing both endocarp and seed coat, however, promoted germination in a high percentage of non-stratified seeds. Treatment of intact, non-stratified seeds with gibberellic acid (GA(3)) was only partially effective in breaking dormancy. However, GA(3) promoted germination of non-stratified seeds in which the endocarp (but not the seed coat) had been removed. The order of abscisic acid (ABA) concentration in fresh seeds was endocarp > seed coat > embryo, and its concentration in endocarp plus seed coat was about 6.2-fold higher than that in the embryo. Total ABA contents of seeds subjected to warm and/or cold moist stratification were reduced 6- to 12-fold. A higher concentration of GA(4) was detected in embryos of non-dormant than in those of dormant seeds. Fluridone, a carotenoid biosynthesis inhibitor, was efficient in breaking dormancy of Prunus seeds. Paclobutrazol, a GA biosynthesis inhibitor, completely inhibited seed germination, and the inhibitory effect could be partially reversed by GA(4), but not by GA(3) Thus, dormancy in P campanulata seeds is imposed by the covering layers. Dormancy break is accompanied by a decrease in ABA content of the covering layers and germination by an increase of embryonic GA(4) content.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available