4.6 Article

A dominant role for p53-dependent cellular senescence in radiosensitization of human prostate cancer cells

Journal

CELL CYCLE
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages 595-605

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.4161/cc.6.5.3901

Keywords

apoptosis; 22Rv1; clonogenic death; H2AX; nutlin; PTEN; p53 tetramer

Categories

Funding

  1. PHS HHS [R01098195] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Because p53 inactivation may limit the effectiveness of radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer, it is important to understand how this gene regulates clonogenic survival after an exposure to ionizing radiation. Here, we show that premature cellular senescence is the principal mode of cell death accounting for the radiosensitivity of human prostate cancer cell lines retaining p53 function. Alternative stress response pathways controlled by this tumor suppressor, including cell cycle arrest, DNA damage repair, mitotic catastrophe and apoptosis, contributed significantly less to radiation-induced clonogenic death. Using a dominant negative C-terminal fragment of p53, we present the first evidence that a complete loss of endogenous p53 function is sufficient to limit the irradiation-induced senescence and clonogenic death of prostate cancer cells. Conversely, inheritance of wild-type p53 by prostate cancer cells lacking a functional allele of this gene (i.e., DU145) significantly increases clonogenic death through p53-dependent cellular senescence and apoptotic pathways. Our data provide evidence that mutations of even one p53 allele may be sufficient to alter their clonogenic fate. In addition, they support the idea that the p53 pathway can be used as a specific target for enhancing the radiosensitivity of prostate cancer cells. Activation of p53 by the drug nutlin-3 is shown to be an effective radiosensitizer of prostate cancer cells retaining functional alleles of p53 and this effect was entirely attributable to an increased induction of p53-dependent cellular senescence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available