4.6 Article

Do the matrix degrading enzymes cathepsins B and D increase following a high intensity exercise regime?

Journal

OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages 343-349

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2006.08.014

Keywords

osteoarthritis; cathepsin B; cathepsin D; exercise; load

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: It has been shown by others that levels of matrix degrading enzymes are increased in osteoarthritis (OA) and so are proposed to be involved in the aetiopathogenesis of the disease, including exercise-associated OA. Therefore we hypothesised that cathepsin B and cathepsin D were increased in cartilage samples previously shown to have early stage CA from 2-year-old Thoroughbred horses, euthanased for reasons other than this study, that had a history of 19-week high intensity exercise (n = 6) compared to age and sex-matched horses with a history of low intensity exercise (n = 6). Methods: Cartilage samples were used from four specific sites within the carpal joints. Standard immunolocalisation protocols and blind counting of positive and negative cells within the articular surface, mid-zone and deep zone (DZ) were used to test our hypothesis. Results: A high intensity exercise regime did not significantly alter the number of chondrocytes positive for cathepsin B, whereas a significant decrease was found for cathepsin D in the DZ, indicating that these enzymes are regulated differently by mechanical loading. Furthermore, cathepsin D varied according to the topographical location within the joint, reflecting biomechanical differences experienced during a high compared to a low intensity exercise regime. Conclusion: This study disproves our hypothesis that cathepsins B and D are increased following a high intensity exercise regime unlike that reported for other matrix enzymes. (C) 2006 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available