4.6 Article

Identification and characterization of layer-specific differences in extraocular muscle M-bands

Journal

INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE
Volume 48, Issue 3, Pages 1119-1127

Publisher

ASSOC RESEARCH VISION OPHTHALMOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.06-0701

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NEI NIH HHS [EY013862] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PURPOSE. To examine and characterize the expression of M-bands (or M-lines) in the orbital layer (OL) and global layer (GL) of adult rat extraocular muscles (EOMs). METHODS. Semiquantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR), quantitative (q)PCR, immunohistochemistry, and confocal microscopy Were used to analyze expression of the major gene and protein constituents of M-bands in freshly dissected and cryosectioned rectus extraocular muscles (EOMs) and tibialis anterior (TA) muscles. Electron microscopy (EM) was performed on perfusion-fixed EOMs and TA muscles in a layer-specific manner, to determine, characterize, and quantify laminar-specific differences in M-band expression. RESULTS. These studies demonstrate EOM layer-specific differences in the expression of M-bands and their major constituents, myomesin1 (Myom1) and myomesin2 (Myom2 or Mprotein) at the structural, mRNA, and protein levels by using EM, semiquantitative PCR, qPCR, immunohistochemistry, and confocal microscopy. Differences in thick filament lattice order were quantified by using EM-based inter-thick-filament distance and variance measurements and were found to be TA > GL > OL. CONCLUSIONS. The expression pattern of M-bands and their constituents in EOMs provides mechanistic insight for their allotypic and layer-specific viscoelastic properties. Modeling the differential expression of M-bands between EOMs and TA predicts increased elasticity but reduced force and eccentric contraction (ECC)-mediated damage in EOMs and suggests a potential mechanism for the clinical sparing of EOMs noted in Duchenne's muscular dystrophy (DMD).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available