4.7 Article

Characterizing young brown dwarfs using low-resolution near-infrared spectra

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 657, Issue 1, Pages 511-520

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/510845

Keywords

infrared : stars; stars : formation; stars : low-mass, brown dwarfs

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present near-infrared (1.0-2.4 mu m) spectra confirming the youth and cool temperatures of six brown dwarfs and low-mass stars with circumstellar disks toward the Chamaeleon II and Ophiuchus star-forming regions. The spectrum of one of our objects indicates a spectral type of similar to L1, making it one of the latest spectral type young brown dwarfs identified to date. Comparing spectra of young brown dwarfs, field dwarfs, and giant stars, we define a 1.49-1.56 mu m H2O index capable of determining spectral type to +/- 1 subtype, independent of gravity. We have also defined an index basedon the 1.14 mu m sodium feature that is sensitive to gravity, but only weakly dependent on spectral type. Our 1.14 mu m Na index can be used to distinguish young cluster members (tau less than or similar to 5 Myr) from young field dwarfs, both of which may have the triangular H-band continuum shape that persists for at least tens of Myr. Using T-eff values determined from the spectral types of our objects along with luminosities derived from near and mid-infrared photometry, we place our objects on the H-R diagram and overlay evolutionary models to estimate the masses and ages of our young sources. Three of our sources have inferred ages (tau similar or equal to 10-30 Myr) that are significantly older than the median stellar age of their parent clouds (1-3 Myr). For these three objects, we derive masses similar to 3 times greater than expected for 1-3 Myr old brown dwarfs with the bolometric luminosities of our sources. The large discrepancies in the inferred masses and ages determined using two separate, yet reasonable, methods emphasize the need for caution when deriving or exploiting brown dwarf mass and age estimates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available