4.6 Article

Dendritic cell recruitment in lesions of human and experimental pulmonary hypertension

Journal

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL
Volume 29, Issue 3, Pages 462-468

Publisher

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY SOC JOURNALS LTD
DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00094706

Keywords

dendritic cells; immunopathology; inflammation; monocrotaline; pulmonary arterial hypertension

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the present study, the hypothesis that dendritic cells (DCs), key players in immunity and tolerance, might be involved in the immunopathology of idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH) was tested. The phenotype and localisation of DCs were characterised by immunohistochemistry and double-labelling immunofluorescence in lung samples from controls, human IPAH patients and an experimental pulmonary hypertension model (monocrotaline-exposed rats). As compared with controls, morphometric analysis demonstrated increased numbers of dendritic cell-specific intercellular adhesion molecule-grabbing nonintegrin (DC-SIGN)-positive cells in muscular pulmonary arteries in IPAH and OX-62-positive DCs in monocrotaline-induced pulmonary hypertension. In human samples, the mean +/- SEM number of DC-SIGN-positive cells(.)artery(-1) of 100-300 mu m diameter was 1.4 +/- 0.4 in controls versus 26.4 +/- 2.7 in IPAH. In rats, the number of OX-62-positive cells(.)artery(-1) of 50-150 mu m diameter was 0.5 +/- 0.2 in controls, and 0.7 +/- 0.5, 3.1 +/- 0.5 and 8.4 +/- 0.6 at day 7, 14 and 28 after monocrotaline exposure, respectively. Human complex lesions of muscular pulmonary arteries showed transmural DC infiltration. Phenotyping revealed an immature DC profile in human and experimental pulmonary hypertension. The results support the concept that immature dendritic cells accumulate in remodelled pulmonary vessels and hence could be involved in the immunopathology of pulmonary hypertension.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available