4.5 Article

Flow-metabolism coupling in human visual, motor, and supplementary motor areas assessed by magnetic resonance imaging

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
Volume 57, Issue 3, Pages 538-547

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.21171

Keywords

cerebrovascular coupling; functional MRI; oxygen metabolism; BOLD; CBF

Funding

  1. MRC [G0100811, G120/969] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Medical Research Council [G0100811, G120/969] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Medical Research Council [G120/969, G0100811] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Combined blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) and arterial spin labeling (ASL) functional MRI (fMRI) was performed for simultaneous investigation of neurovascular coupling in the primary visual cortex (PVC), primary motor cortex (PMC), and supplementary motor area (SMA). The hypercapnia-calibrated method was employed to estimate the fractional change in cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen consumption (CMRO2) using both a group-average and a per-subject calibration. The group-averaged calibration showed significantly different CMRO2-CBF coupling ratios in the three regions (PVC: 0.34 +/- 0.03; PMC: 0.24 +/- 0.03; and SMA: 0.40 +/- 0.02). Part of this difference emerges from the calculated values of the hypercapnic calibration constant M in each region (M-PVC = 6.6 +/- 3.4 M-PMC = 4.3 +/- 3.5, and M-SMA = 7.2 +/- 4.1), while a relatively minor part comes from the spread and shape of the sensorimotor BOLD-CBF responses. The averages of the per-subject calibrated CMRO2-CBF slopes were 0.40 +/- 0.04 (PVC), 0.31 +/- 0.03 (PMC), and 0.44 +/- 0.03 (SMA). These results are 10-30% higher than group-calibrated values, and are potentially more useful for quantifying individual differences in focal functional responses. The group-average calibrated motor coupling value is increased to 0.28 +/- 0.03 when stimulus-correlated increases in end-tidal CO2 are included. Our results support the existence of regional differences in neurovascular coupling, and argue for the importance of achieving optimal accuracy in hypercapnia calibrations to resolve method-dependent variations in published results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available