4.6 Article

Association of the built environment with physical activity and obesity in older persons

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 97, Issue 3, Pages 486-492

Publisher

AMER PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOC INC
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.085837

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [P20 RR020774] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIA NIH HHS [U01/AG06781, U01 AG006781] Funding Source: Medline
  3. PHS HHS [T32/HP10002, 1-U48/CCU209663] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. We examined whether older persons who live in areas that are conducive to walking are more active or less obese than those living in areas where walking is more difficult. Methods. We used data from the Adult Changes in Thought cohort study for a cross-sectional analysis of 936 participants aged 65 to 97 years. The Walkable and Elikable Communities Project previously formulated a walkability score to predict the probability of walking in King County, Washington. Data from the cohort study were linked to the walkability score at the participant level using a geographic information system. Analyses tested for associations between walkability score and activity and body mass index. Results. Higher walkability scores were associated with significantly more walking for exercise across buffers (circular zones around each respondent's home) of varying radii (for men, odds ratio [OR] = 5.86; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.01, 34.17 to OR =9.14; Cl = 1.23, 68.11; for women, OR = 1.63; Cl =0.94,2.83 to OR = 1.77; Cl = 1.03, 3.04). A trend toward lower body mass index in men living in more walkable neighborhoods did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions. Findings suggest that neighborhood characteristics are associated with the frequency of walking for physical activity in older people. Whether frequency of walking reduces obesity prevalence is less clear.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available