4.6 Article

Natural course following the onset of cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B: a long-term follow-up study

Journal

HEPATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages 267-273

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12072-007-5001-0

Keywords

hepatitis flare; hepatic decompensation; hepatocellular carcinoma; HBeAg seroconversion; HBsAg seroconversion

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose To elucidate the long-term natural course following the onset of cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Methods Ninety-three patients with chronic hepatitis B who had developed cirrhosis during regular follow-up were included in this long-term follow-up study. At the time of cirrhosis detection, 30% of the patients were seropositive for hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) and 73% had a HBV-DNA level >10(4) copies/ml. Follow-up studies included liver biochemistry, viral markers, alpha-fetoprotein and ultrasonography every 3-6 months. Results During a mean follow-up period of 102 +/- 60 (12-246; median 97) months, 32 patients (34.4%) experienced 55 episodes of hepatitis flare (7.0%/year), 15 (53.6%) of 28 HBeAg-positive patients seroconverted to anti-HBe (6.3%/yr) and 12 (12.9%) lost HBsAg (1.5%/year). Overall disease progression was observed in 25 (26.9%, 3.2%/year) patients: 12 (12.9%, 1.5%/year) hepatic decompensation, 21 (22.6%, 2.7%/year) hepatocellular carcinoma and 11 (11.8%, 1.4%/year) died. Multivariate analysis showed that age at onset of cirrhosis (P = 0.015) and persistent HBeAg seropositivity (P = 0.019) were the independent factors for overall disease progression. Conclusions These results suggest that patients with older age at onset of cirrhosis and persistent HBeAg seropositivity following the onset of cirrhosis were independent factors for the disease progression in the first 10-year after the development of cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available