4.5 Article

Spike frequency adaptation of rat hindlimb motoneurons

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 102, Issue 3, Pages 1041-1050

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01148.2006

Keywords

spinal cord; square-wave pulse injection; persistent inward current

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of our study was to resolve two issues pertaining to motoneuron (MN) spike frequency adaptation (SFA): 1) to develop an index of SFA that is sensitive to a wide range of adaptation patterns and would correlate well with MN excitability and 2) to determine whether SFA pattern is stimulus current dependent. Sprague-Dawley rats (250 - 350 g) were anesthetized (ketamine-xylazine) before electrophysiological properties from sciatic nerve MNs located in the lumbar spinal cord were recorded. SFA was measured by 30-s square-wave current injections at 1.5, 3.0, and 5.0 nA above estimated rhythmic firing threshold. Discharges per second were significantly (P < 0.001) higher for 5-nA than for 1.5- and 3-nA currents > rhythmic firing threshold in the first 2 s. SFA was quantified by using ratios of the final to initial number of discharges with 1-, 2-, and 5- s bins. The best index of SFA was the percent decline in the number of spikes fired in the fifth 5- s bin relative to the first 5- s bin [1 - (bin 5/bin 1)]. With the use of this index, we found that SFA was significantly correlated with several measures of MN excitability, including estimated persistent inward current amplitude (r = -0.76) and rheobase current (r = 0.71), and tended to correlate with input resistance (r = -0.43) and frequency-current slope (r = -0.57). This index also showed the widest range of SFA among MNs. In conclusion, an SFA pattern can be ascertained for each MN and becomes more pronounced as MN excitability decreases. Finally, for the first time, we report evidence of a relationship between persistent inward current and SFA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available