4.5 Article

Carbohydrate ingestion augments L-carnitine retention in humans

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 102, Issue 3, Pages 1065-1070

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01011.2006

Keywords

novel organic cation transporter 2; insulin; skeletal muscle

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Maintaining hyperinsulinemia (similar to 150 mU/l) during steady- state hypercarnitinemia (similar to 550 mu mol/l) increases skeletal muscle total carnitine (TC) content by similar to 15% within 5 h. The present study aimed to investigate whether an increase in whole body carnitine retention can be achieved through L-carnitine feeding in conjunction with a dietary-induced elevation in circulating insulin. On two randomized visits ( study A), eight men ingested 3 g/day L-carnitine followed by 4 x 500-ml solutions, each containing flavored water ( Con) or 94 g simple sugars ( glucose syrup; CHO). In addition, 14 men ingested 3 g/day L-carnitine followed by 2 x 500 ml of either Con or CHO for 2 wk ( study B). Carbohydrate ingestion in study A resulted in a fourfold greater serum insulin area under the curve when compared with Con (P < 0.001) and in a lower plasma TC concentration throughout the CHO visit (P < 0.05). Twenty-four-hour urinary TC excretion in the CHO visit was lower than in the Con visit in study A (155.0 +/- 10.7 vs. 212.1 +/- 17.2 mg; P < 0.05). In study B, daily urinary TC excretion increased after 3 days (65.9 +/- 18.0 to 281.0 +/- 35.0 mg; P < 0.001) and remained elevated throughout the Con trial. During the CHO trial, daily urinary TC excretion increased from a similar basal value of 53.8 +/- 9.2 to 166.8 +/- 17.3 mg after 3 days (P < 0.01), which was less than during the Con trial (P < 0.01), and it remained lower over the course of the study (P < 0.001). The difference in plasma TC concentration in study A and 24-h urinary TC excretion in both studies suggests that insulin augmented the retention of carnitine in the CHO trials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available