4.5 Article

Diagnostic accuracy of body mass index to identify obesity in older adults: NHANES 1999-2004

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY
Volume 40, Issue 5, Pages 761-767

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/ijo.2015.243

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Dartmouth Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Research Center - Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [U48DP005018]
  2. Health Resources Services Administration [UB4HP19206-01-00]
  3. Department of Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
  4. Dartmouth Centers for Health and Aging
  5. National Institute of Mental Health [K12 HS0217695 (AHRQ), NIMH: T32 MH073553, R01 MH078052, R01 MH089811, R24 MH102794 CDC U48DP005018]
  6. NHLBI [R01 HL114676-02, R01 HL114024-03, R01 HL065176-12]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Body composition changes with aging lead to increased adiposity and decreased muscle mass, making the diagnosis of obesity challenging. Conventional anthropometry, including body mass index (BMI), while easy to use clinically may misrepresent adiposity. We determined the diagnostic accuracy of BMI using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) in assessing the degree of obesity in older adults. METHODS: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys 1999-2004 were used to identify adults aged >= 60 years with DEXA measures. They were categorized (yes/no) as having elevated body fat by gender (men: >= 25%; women >= 35%) and by BMI >= 25 and >= 30 kg m(-2). The diagnostic performance of BMI was assessed. Metabolic characteristics were compared in discordant cases of BMI/body fat. Weighting and analyses were performed per NHANES (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey) guidelines. RESULTS: We identified 4984 subjects (men: 2453; women: 2531). Mean BMI and % body fat was 28.0 kg m(-2) and 30.8% in men, and 28.5 kg m(-2) and 42.1% in women. A BMI >= 30 kg m(-2) had a low sensitivity and moderately high specificity (men: 32.9 and 80.8%, concordance index 0.66; women: 38.5 and 78.5%, concordance 0.69) correctly classifying 41.0 and 45.1% of obese subjects. A BMI >= 25 kg m(-2) had a moderately high sensitivity and specificity (men: 80.7 and 99.6%, concordance 0.81; women: 76.9 and 98.8%, concordance 0.84) correctly classifying 80.8 and 78.5% of obese subjects. In subjects with BMI < 30 kg m(-2), body fat was considered elevated in 67.1% and 61.5% of men and women, respectively. For a BMI >= 30 kg m(-2), sensitivity drops from 40.3% to 14.5% and 44.5% to 23.4%, whereas specificity remains elevated (>98%), in men and women, respectively, in those 60-69.9 years to subjects aged >= 80 years. Correct classification of obesity using a cutoff of 30 kg m(-2) drops from 48.1 to 23.9% and 49.0 to 19.6%, in men and women in these two age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Traditional measures poorly identify obesity in the elderly. In older adults, BMI may be a suboptimal marker for adiposity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available